This is in response to some of the editorials and a few other emails that I have seen. I do agree that it may appear that the school board is divided by towns, however, I feel that there are a couple of those members that are trying to do what is right for our " School District" and there are more that are trying to do what is right for their "town".
The best proposal was voted down the other night with the reason given to let a new administrator step in and see what can be done. Well, can we as a "school district" afford that? Is this a true honest reason, or is this just an excuse? The referendum is up for vote very soon. Comments have been made that "wouldn't it be funny if we can get the referendum passed and then close Fieldcrest South Elementary anyway." I don't see any humor in that. So, is this what is going to happen or is the issue put to rest definitely until a new Superintendent is hired? The 3 that did vote for this proposal are yes from Minonk or at least the original MDR. However, I feel that they were voting for the best proposal as a district and our children. Not just for Minonk.
I as a parent don't want my 1st grader bussed all over the country. He is on a bus long enough now, only to be at the school 25 minutes before school even starts. Bus routes have always been an issue already. It will become an even bigger issue with closing south and having to get all those students to another town. I would venture to say that this would mean more busses, more gas, more drivers, more expense.....Some kids are already on the bus for over an hour now. As a working mother, I don't have the option of taking my child to school and picking him up. I rely on the busses to do this. And I prefer to know they are safe and home as soon as possible. Homework and extra curricular activities already leave little time for families to be just that, a Family. Instead 3 hours total out of the day would be spent on busses. That's longer then most parents commute to and from work.
Some people think their towns will "die" with out a school. Well this option still leaves a school in each town. And most people would prefer the grade schools to be close to home I would think. If South were to close that will put some families with students in all 3 towns. Can you imagine having to run to all 3 towns to round up your kids? Most schools that I know of have one Jr. High. What is so wrong with that idea? But then even it we get to the point of one Jr. High, there are people that still think that the gyms need to still be used at the other school for games. If we have one Jr. High then lets have one Jr. High. Gym and all.
Already the letters are going out from the CAC because parents haven't, can't or won't pay the fees. These letters are saying that students can't even order a year book or a class ring with out paying this fee. Which I am not sure makes sense because doesn't the parent or student still pay for these items. They are not included with the fees. Those are yet extra expenses on top of that. This is yet another reason that decisions need to be made. The tension and anger are just going to continue to rise until decisions are made that can save our school district money. We need to find a way to reduce the financial burden off the tax payers and parents. This is something that has been talked about for a lengthy amount of time. Then to find out that these savings we are hearing about are probably not right because the expenses can't be figured into it at this point.
We were all given a chance to voice our opinions. What I find odd is that only 169 comments
were returned to the school after the open houses in all 3 communities were held. That is not
very many people voicing their thoughts or opinions when they are asked. I am sure more then will voice their opinions after the fact. When the changes are made and nothing can be done about them. And for those of you who do have all the answers, maybe you should run for school board and see first hand the job they do and all the countless phone calls and sleepless nights that I know some of them endure.
Kim Barth
To Whom It May Concern:
I spoke at the school board meeting on August 19, 2004, concerning the closing of the South Elementary Grade School. From this meeting, I have been misunderstood as well as misquoted on a few issues and I would like to take this time to clarify these issues.
On Minonk Talk under the Board of Education Column, it states that I said Minonk takes all of the blame for the districts population. There is no blame for the population. I stated that Minonk has the largest base of students---why close the school with the largest base? Also, Mr. Pickard felt I was saying Minonk was better than the other communities. I did not say that or try to imply this. I stated that the M-D-R school district was better for me as a Minonk resident. Since we�ve consolidated, the Minonk residents have less now than we had before. It seems whenever a sacrifice has to be made, it is the M-D-R residents who are making the largest sacrifices. For one example, the students from the original M-D-R district get split up during their school years. The others go to school with their classmates for all twelve years of school.
This column also states that Mr. Pickard said �the tax burden is shared by ALL district residents not just Minonk�. I for one am aware of this. It was not the residents that claimed the Toluca grade school was perfectly fine! Nor was it the residents that opted for a town wide TIF! These problems were created by previous leaders. I have a suggestion for Mr. Pickard and fellow board members (that�s out of the box) - get all of the communities to pay the total tax dollars that the school district has missed out on (past and future). After all, �the tax burden is shared by ALL district residents not just Minonk�. It seems that some communities feel that �what�s yours is mine and what�s mine is mine�.
At the meeting on August 19, 2004, Mr. Pickard stated that just because taxes rise, it does not mean the school gets more. He is absolutely correct. In Wenona, the district did not get any increase. My personal 1993 taxes paid in 1994 to the district were $703.02. My personal taxes paid this year for 2003 are $1,842.77. I know if my taxes increased that much, so did everybody else�s in Minonk. Imagine if Minonk had a town wide TIF! How many years ago would the school district have gone broke?
I feel that if we close Elementary South in Minonk you run a huge risk in future assessed valuation causing more burden on the district. Mr. Pickard also stated that this district did better than I stated, that it was five years before an increase not two or three as I stated. I�m not sure what he means here, I stated that it was two years after consolidation when we had our first referendum to tear down the perfectly fine Toluca Grade School that failed. Then after four years this same referendum passed. Did he refer to the fact that I stated M-D-R school district had two to three years in the black? May I remind you of our assessed valuation increase? If we were still M-D-R would we still need an educational rate increase?
Now apparently some people feel these issues are not important. If we could take the monies from the Toluca school, the Wenona roof, the TIF and then add this to the districts bottom line---would we be making these cuts and closing a school?
What City leaders need to understand is that to be a community, schools need residents and businesses, residents need schools and businesses, and businesses need schools and residents. If one cheats the other, they ALL suffer!! We need long-term plans that involve everyone, until this happens we will not have a great school district!
Every generation tries to give their children more than they have and that creates progress. If we keep taking away from the district, we take away from our children. We need to step up to the plate and make a difference.
I apologize for anyone I may have offended-----this was not my intent I just wanted to state some facts.
Sincerely,
Scott Hillenburg